Proper comma usage isn't just about SAT scores—it's about clear communication that can have real-world consequences:
Medical Example: The Loss of Life or Limb
"I agree; we definitely need to amputate, Jeff." vs. "I agree; we definitely need to amputate Jeff."
✅ Correct: "I agree; we definitely need to amputate, Jeff."
The comma indicates that Jeff is being addressed directly.
❌ Incorrect: "I agree; we definitely need to amputate Jeff."
Without the comma, it appears Jeff needs amputation, and he is the patient.
Real World Application
Medical records are binding legal documents, and even a misplaced comma—like in “I agree, we definitely need to amputate Jeff” instead of “I agree, we definitely need to amputate, Jeff”—can dramatically alter meaning with devastating consequences. If Jeff, who wasn’t the patient, was mistakenly amputated due to such ambiguity, the fallout would likely include malpractice lawsuits, possible criminal charges, loss of medical licensure, institutional liability, and irreparable ethical damage. In a medical environment, this comma could mean the difference between saving a limb and a catastrophic error. This underscores the critical need for clarity and precision in all written documentation.
Legal Example: Ambiguous Inheritance
Consider a stenographer was hired by a paralegal, Jane Vokensniffle, to transcribe the words, verbatim, of an ill patient. As the stenographer listens and writes, she adds this clause to the patient's will:
"I hereby bequeath my estate to my son, Kevin Smiklemap, Jane Vokensniffle, and my daughter—Jessica Snoopsnuffer."
🥸 Possible Interpretation:
The estate is arguably being bequeathed to:
- The patient's son (unnamed or Kevin)
- Kevin Smiklemap
- Jane Vokensniffle (or she is simply being spoken to)
- The patient's daughter (unnamed)
Jessica Snoopsnuffer is being spoken to directly, as indicated by the em dash.
This structure, while simple, allows for the intended meaning to come across: the estate goes to the son, Kevin, Jane, and the daughter—and Jessica is simply being addressed directly as the lawyer reading the will.
Legal Consideration: This will probably won't hold up under scrutiny, though. Why? Well, the will could be challenged by unnamed children—especially if there is more than one son or daughter. Additionally, the sentence contains syntactic ambiguity: a list with multiple names and titles, including “my son,” “Kevin Smiklemap,” and “Jane Vokensniffle,” without clarifying if Kevin is the son or a separate recipient. Appositives like “my son” and names can be misread as either identifiers or separate items. Furthermore, while the em dash before “Jessica Snoopsnuffer” might suggest direct address, its placement after the list creates unclear boundaries—is Jessica inheriting, or merely being acknowledged as the will is read aloud? Courts typically default to additive readings of comma-separated lists, and the absence of parallel naming for “my son” and “my daughter” weakens the structural consistency. In high-stakes inheritance cases, such ambiguities are fertile ground for legal challenges, especially when beneficiaries—or disinherited parties—have cause to dispute the document’s intent.
Still Not Convinced?
The College Board Digital SAT isn't an arbitrary test designed to rank the smartest person in the room. It is simply a tool of measurement that allows both individuals and academic institutions to know if the test-taker still hasn't mastered some of the most basic competencies essential for success in an academic and/or professional setting. So, whether it was the stenographer who failed or the paralegal—who filed the will in probate court—either way, basic punctuation is the real problem here, regardless as to who is at fault.
SAT Statistics
- Approximately 20% of Standard English Conventions questions directly test comma usage.
- Comma questions appear in 3-5 questions per SAT Reading & Language Module.
- Students who master comma rules improve their overall score by 40-60 points on average.